Papers with RL training
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown promising performance in various downstream tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a deep reasoning translation model that learns free translation via reinforcement learning (RL) they build a reward model with pre-defined scoring criteria on the translation results and thought processes . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms strong deep reasoning LLMs in literature translation and outperformed other models. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models exhibit highly homogeneous, repetitive responses, resulting in inefficient exploration. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that constructs semantically consistent yet distributionally distinct prior contents to different responses and decouple the one-to-many mapping. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves absolute performance by 5.3% and increases generation diversity by 198.3% on average while significantly enhancing output diversity and test-time scaling. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing code sandboxes fail to provide accurate verification and efficiency under high-concurrency workloads. |
| Approach: | They propose a high-fidelity code verification system that provides sandbox feedback for RL training and evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system outperforms heuristic-matching baselines on LiveCodeBench and training stability on high-concurrency workloads. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior work has successfully applied Reinforcement Learning (RL) to mathematical reasoning, but generalization to broader domains remains challenging due to limited data and lack of verifiable rewards for unstructured domains. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that integrates multi-domain corpora into RL training to improve generalization across diverse reasoning tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves generalization across diverse reasoning tasks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches allocate an equal number of rollouts to all questions during the RL process, which is inefficient. |
| Approach: | They propose a mechanism for dynamically allocating rollout budgets based on the difficulty of the problems, enabling more efficient RL training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves response precision while preserving exploratory ability to uncover potential correct pathways. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing RL methods rely on unstructured self-sampling to fit scalar rewards, resulting in inefficient rollouts. |
| Approach: | They propose a structured template-guided RL framework that augments policy optimization with explicit template guidance. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that TemplateRL outperforms GRPO and GRPI by 99% on AIME and 41% on AMC with superior stability on weak models and remarkable cross-domain generalization. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | entropy in reinforcement learning functions analogously to the learning rate in LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose an entropy scheduling system that optimizes different pre-set goals by controlling and scheduling entropicy at each step of the RL process. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves AIME2024 from 50.9 to 54.9 within 40 training steps. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work integrates reinforcement learning with compiler feedback to enhance code generation quality but the long code generated by LLMs makes RL exploration ineffective. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that integrates reinforcement learning and compiler feedback to enhance code generation quality. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in corresponding benchmarks and integrates reinforcement learning with compiler feedback to improve code generation quality. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our approach to aligning large language models with human preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that evaluates and assigns specific credit to each token using an off-the-shelf reward model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method evaluates and assigns specific credit to each token using an off-the-shelf reward model. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has used reward functions learned from human annotations to align conditional text generation models with desired behaviors. |
| Approach: | They propose to use reinforcement learning to train conditional text generation models with reward functions learned from human annotations to align outputs with desired behaviors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the quality of generated summaries by using saliency and faithfulness metrics. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing deep reinforcement learning methods require many trials before convergence and no direct interpretability of trained policies is provided. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel RL method which can learn symbolic and interpretable rules in their differentiable network. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can learn symbolic and interpretable rules in their differentiable network. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Explicit /think> tags are used to expose intermediate reasoning and enable hybrid thinking behaviors. |
| Approach: | They propose a training-free prompting format that combines these triggers to achieve intermediate-budget reasoning, outperforming fixed-token and prompt-based baselines in terms of the accuracy–length trade-off. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms fixed-token and prompt-based prompts in accuracy–length trade-offs while improving Qwen3-8B on AIME from 69.8% to 72.4% and on GPQA from 58.5% to 61.1%. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for multi-turn function calling are limited by redundancy and lack explicit integration of progress awareness into training. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that explicitly integrates progress awareness into LLM training for multi-turn function calling. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that Progra outperforms existing methods on two public benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing reinforcement learning methods do not provide fine-grained supervision for complex reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a reinforcement learning method that incorporates a generative model as the reward model and a token-level supervision model for RL training. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on 8 tasks show the proposed method is effective . |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite the promising performance of Large Vision Language Models, they sometimes generate incorrect outputs. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-modal reward model that aligns LVLMs with human preferences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves excellent results on the latest multi-modal reward model benchmark and shows competitive performance on text-only reward model. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning (RL) is a promising approach for aligning large language models knowledge with sequential decision-making tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a contrastive loss framework to analyze the sensitivity of LLMs to prompt formulations following RL training in a textual environment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the model's robustness and generalization capabilities by minimizing the model’s internal representations and salient tokens. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that reinforcement learning (RL) is an effective approach for improving the performance of neural machine translation systems. |
| Approach: | They propose to leverage reinforcement learning to boost the performance of NMT systems trained with monolingual data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves competitive results on translation tasks in English-German, Chinese-English and English-English systems. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that the proposed selective token generation algorithm outperforms the previous additive learning algorithms based on the PLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose an additive learning algorithm that selectively outputs language tokens between a task-general PLM and a specific adapter during training and inference. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm outperforms existing methods on few-shot natural language generation tasks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning (RL) can align language models with non-differentiable reward signals, such as human preferences, but the sparsity of these signals can lead to inefficient and unstable learning. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that utilizes the critique capability of Large Language Models to produce intermediate-step rewards during RL training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves sample efficiency and the overall performance of the policy model, supported by both automatic and human evaluation. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent coder models have been driven by supervised fine-tuning, but the potential of reinforcement learning remains unexplored due to the lack of reliable reward data/model in the code domain. |
| Approach: | They propose a pipeline that generates extensive test-case pairs from existing code data and constructs preference pairs based on pass rates over sampled programs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline generates extensive (question, test-cases) pairs from existing code data and trains them with Bradley-Terry loss. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for On-Policy LLM RL typically train a separate process reward model, which suffers from distribution mismatch and reward hacking. |
| Approach: | They propose a reinforcement learning framework that directly incorporates on-policy tree search for RL training. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on math and code reasoning benchmarks show that tree search achieves superior performance compared to traditional ChainRL. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning (RL) training typically improves single-sample success rates but limited exploration of diverse reasoning trajectories. |
| Approach: | They propose a training paradigm that interleaves conventional RL with inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) they propose 'Steering Probability Squeezing' to enhance exploration without external supervision . |
| Outcome: | The proposed training paradigm improves Pass@k and improves exploration of diverse reasoning trajectories without external supervision. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Query-focused Summarization (QfS) is a system that generates summaries from document(s) based on a query. |
| Approach: | They propose a Query-focused Summarization approach that uses a generalization of Reinforcement Learning (RL) for Natural Language Generation and a better semantic similarity reward. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves on the ROUGE-L metric and in a benchmark dataset. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this study, we explore inference-time scaling on table reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale dataset of reasoning traces and a reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards approach to enable inference-time scaling on table reasoning tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model matches or exceeds GPT-4.1 and DeepSeek-R1 models on diverse table reasoning tasks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Modern language models demonstrate impressive coding capabilities in common programming languages (PLs) but their performance in lower-resource PLs is often limited by training data availability. |
| Approach: | They propose a zero-shot cross-programming-language transfer task for code RL . they propose RL training in a source PL fails to improve performance on other target PLs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves transferability in Llama-3.1 code generation on parallel-stack model . it also improves performance on other target PLs, compared to single-PL SFT . |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite advances in reinforcement learning, data collection and fine-tuning remain costly and hard to scale. |
| Approach: | They propose a video-adaptive test-time scaling strategy that combines RL with a supervised fine-tuning strategy to improve video reasoning capability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method surpasses existing models by 2.4% in accuracy using only 3.6% training samples. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have demonstrated that supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning are effective in integrating knowledge injection with robust generalization. |
| Approach: | They propose a unified post-training framework that addresses intrinsic limitations of supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses SFT-based methods and yields policies that integrate more smoothly with subsequent RL training. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a pipeline that automatically discovers thinking token patterns with reasoning primitives and curates SFT datasets to prepare LLMs for RL. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline outperforms baseline methods on mathematical and logical reasoning benchmarks on RL tasks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Best practices for RL in instruction following remain underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a verification method that combines rule-based code verification with LLM-based verification from a large reasoning model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance among models of comparable size and generalizes well to unseen constraints. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models have demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities through step-by-step chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, but their strictly sequential nature constrains test-time scalability. |
| Approach: | They propose an end-to-end reinforcement learning framework to enhance LLMs' DAC-style reasoning capacity by decomposing a problem into subproblems and solving them sequentially. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model surpasses CoT by 8.6% and 6.3% on competition-level benchmarks and is available at the [github.com/MasterVito/DAC-RL]. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning (RL) is a principled way to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models, yet its effectiveness hinges on training signals that remain informative as models evolve. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that sustains effective learning signals through adaptive environment design that transforms real-world programming problems into verifiable reasoning environments with controllable difficulty and unbounded instance generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baselines across diverse reasoning benchmarks and exhibits more stable, long-horizon training dynamics. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong problem-solving competence across domains like research and coding. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a tool repository to analyze the ability of large language model agents to solve complex problems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source and closed-source models in task completion rate and efficiency. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for MLLMs struggle with fine-grained temporal reasoning . despite advances in video understanding, current methods struggle with time-sensitive tasks . |
| Approach: | They propose a time-stamp-aware multi-segment grounding method that enhances temporal understanding by introducing timestamps. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods on time-sensitive tasks and generalizes well across diverse temporal understanding scenarios. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for training large language models rely heavily on high-quality parallel data, which are often scarce or unavailable for low-resource languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a reinforcement training method using only monolingual text to elevate LLMs’ translation capabilities on massive low-resource languages while retaining their performance on high-resourced languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms LLaMAX, one of the strongest open-source multilingual LLMs on 1,414 language directions on Flores-101 dataset. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for integrating external knowledge rely on frozen large language models without explicit supervision or require costly LLM finetuning. |
| Approach: | They propose a structured and plug-and-play agentic retrieval policy with an additional proxy model to control the retrieval process. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on three in-domain and four out-of-domain QA benchmarks show that SPARKLE outperforms state-of the-art adaptive RAG models, achieving average improvements of 9.17% and 2.85%, respectively. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning (RL) is widely applied to boost the performance of pretrained models, yet its training efficiency is severely constrained by rollout generation. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that accelerates the rollout phase for diverse models by equipping a pipeline to equip the multi-layer parameter-sharing MTP for all models and an advantage-aware MTP optimization strategy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves stable growth of acceptance length during RL training, and also accelerates RL rollouts, achieving an average 23.1%–55.3% reduction in rollout time compared to baselines. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) can call tools effectively, but they remain brittle in multi-turn execution. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that converts execution errors into on-policy corrective supervision within the RL training loop. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the error recovery rate of Qwen3-8B by 5.7% absolute and overall accuracy by 4.0% on BFCL v4 Multi-Turn. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in multi-step and long-chain reasoning, but extending their reasoning capabilities to encompass deep interactions with search remains a non-trivial challenge. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for Reasoning–Search integration that integrates multi-reward signals to optimize the reasoning–search interaction trajectories. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on seven datasets show that R-Search significantly outperforms mainstream RAG baselines. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for storing key-value caches during long-horizon rollouts cause performance collapses. |
| Approach: | They propose a new training paradigm that empowers stable RL training under sparse rollouts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model reduces rollout overhead while maintaining the performance. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for RL fail to establish an interpretable connection between data and optimization objectives. |
| Approach: | They propose a data selection method that dynamically estimates the influence of individual training samples on policy optimization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly improves training effectiveness with fewer optimization steps. |